What is the difference between dualism and hylomorphism?
The hylomorphic position is the one espoused by Aristotle, in nuce that the soul is the entelecheia, or substantial form, of the body considered as matter. The dualistic position is that the soul is a separate substance that controls the body, itself also a substance.
Who came up with hylomorphism?
Aristotle
Hylomorphism (Greek υλο- hylo-, “wood, matter” -morphism, Greek -μορφη, morph, “form”) is the metaphysical concept that all natural bodies consist of two principles, form and matter. The word and the concept were first developed by Aristotle in rejection of an atomistic explanation of change.
What is Aristotle’s theory of the soul?
A soul, Aristotle says, is “the actuality of a body that has life,” where life means the capacity for self-sustenance, growth, and reproduction. If one regards a living substance as a composite of matter and form, then the soul is the form of a natural—or, as Aristotle sometimes says, organic—body.
What is Entelechy according to Aristotle?
entelechy, (from Greek entelecheia), in philosophy, that which realizes or makes actual what is otherwise merely potential. The concept is intimately connected with Aristotle’s distinction between matter and form, or the potential and the actual.
Is Hyphmorphism a substance dualism?
Hylomorphic dualism is not a species of Compound Substance Dualism for the simple reason that form and matter are ‘principles’ invoked in the analysis of primary substances but not primary substances themselves. But it is dualistic in that mind and body are mutually irreducible.
What is hyle and Morphe?
1 “Hylo” is a compounding form of hyle, meaning matter, and morphe means form. Com- pound words of the Greek first declension do not use the genitive of the first word. Sometimes the long alpha or eta is retained; at others, by analogy to the second declen- sion, an omicron is substituted.
What is potentiality philosophy?
The concept of potentiality, in this context, generally refers to any “possibility” that a thing can be said to have. Aristotle did not consider all possibilities the same, and emphasized the importance of those that become real of their own accord when conditions are right and nothing stops them.